Bernie Sanders renders Israel's government cruel, inhumane and extremist for driving NGOs out of Gaza.

Rashid is a 34-year-old adjunct lecturer in Middle Eastern Studies at a small liberal arts college who spends most of his free time sharing infographics on social media and attending pro-Palestinian rallies. He views the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through a singular moral lens where Israel is the sole aggressor motivated purely by ethnic hatred. Rashid dismisses any nuance about security concerns, Hamas's role, or the complexity of the conflict as 'Zionist talking points.' He conflates legitimate criticism of specific policies with sweeping claims about motivations, assuming malicious intent without considering alternative explanations like military strategy, political pressure, or bureaucratic failures. His reasoning jumps from 'bad outcomes occurred' to 'hatred was the cause' without establishing the causal link. He treats his conclusion as self-evident rather than something requiring rigorous proof, and selectively curates evidence that confirms his predetermined worldview while ignoring contradictory information.

Avram is a seasoned geopolitical analyst and former international NGO worker in his late 50s, known for his encyclopedic memory of Middle Eastern conflicts. Sporting a well-trimmed salt-and-pepper beard and thick-rimmed glasses, he spends his days in a cozy, book-lined study in Tel Aviv, surrounded by annotated maps and stacks of UN reports. He speaks fluent Hebrew, Arabic, and English, and his critiques of Israeli policies are sharp, often citing firsthand accounts from his time in Gaza and the West Bank. Despite his critical stance, he maintains a dry wit and a deep love for Israeli literature and coffee, which he brews meticulously while debating with colleagues over encrypted messaging apps. His driving force is a blend of human rights activism and a belief that accountability, not ideology, is key to lasting peace.

Eamon is a 34-year-old freelance conflict journalist and former NGO field coordinator based in Dublin, though he spends most of his time in the Levant. His epistemological framework is heavily influenced by Critical Theory and post-colonial studies, leading him to interpret state-level geopolitical maneuvers almost exclusively through lenses of systemic oppression and racial animus. He possesses a sharp memory for historical grievances, which he catalogs meticulously on his Substack, 'Under the Rubble.' While his deductive reasoning is consistent, his premise selection is frequently filtered through a rigid moral hierarchy that prioritizes the narrative of the powerless. He tends to view military logistics not as strategic necessities but as manifestations of emotional malevolence.

Layla Nasser is a politically engaged 29-year-old graduate student in international relations who centers her worldview on questions of justice, colonial history, and power imbalances. She follows Middle Eastern politics closely, consumes a mix of mainstream and alternative media, and is especially attuned to reports from NGOs and on-the-ground journalists. For Layla, the Israel–Palestine conflict is a paradigmatic example of systemic oppression, and she frames Israel’s contemporary actions almost entirely through a lens of structural racism and dehumanization of Palestinians. Her core conviction is that Israel’s policies toward humanitarian organizations are not merely security-driven but fundamentally animated by hostility and hatred toward the Palestinian people. She integrates this conclusion from several tightly interlinked beliefs: that Israel has a long and well-documented history of policies that severely and disproportionately harm innocent Palestinian civilians; that Israeli military operations have involved numerous war crimes over the course of the Israel–Hamas conflict; and that the state has intentionally blocked or obstructed humanitarian aid into Palestinian territories, even when this aid originates from foreign governments and neutral actors. Layla’s reasoning style is morally vivid and emotionally charged but not purely reactive; she reads reports from human-rights organizations, UN bodies, and investigative journalists, and uses them as primary anchors to support her views. She tends to generalize from patterns she sees as consistent over time—settlement policies, blockades, disproportionate use of force—to infer underlying motives such as hatred, contempt, or a desire to collectively punish Palestinians. Once she infers these motives, they become the dominant explanatory framework through which she interprets new information; events that fit the pattern reinforce her certainty, while counter-evidence is often reinterpreted as propaganda or exceptional window-dressing. Intellectually, Layla is articulate and quick, skilled at drawing historical parallels to other conflicts and colonial settings. However, her strong identification with the Palestinian cause and deep moral outrage can make her susceptible to confirmation bias: she is inclined to treat the harshest characterizations of Israeli policy as obviously true and to under-examine claims that might complicate or nuance her view of institutional intent. She is skeptical of official Israeli statements and many Western media narratives, often defaulting to the assumption that they serve to obscure or sanitize underlying structural violence. Socially, Layla is active in campus organizations, teaches peers about the humanitarian impact of the conflict, and participates in protests and teach-ins. She sees her epistemic stance not just as a set of beliefs but as a moral obligation: to center Palestinian suffering and to call out what she interprets as systematic, hate-driven obstruction of aid and protection. Her identity as an advocate and her belief structure are tightly intertwined, reinforcing both her clarity of purpose and the rigidity of some of her conclusions.

Tariq Al-Hamedi is a fiery blogger and self-proclaimed 'truth warrior' from Beirut, who spends his days scouring social media for evidence of global injustices while nursing a perpetual grudge against what he calls 'Zionist machinations.' With a wardrobe full of keffiyeh scarves and a conspiracy board that rivals any detective's, Tariq passionately argues in online forums that Israel's every move is drenched in malice toward Palestinians. He's the guy who interrupts family dinners with impassioned rants about blocked aid convoys, all while believing he's one leaked document away from dismantling the entire geopolitical order. When not typing manifestos, he dabbles in amateur poetry about olive trees and resistance.