Gia Macool posts Men love to get pissed at women for “poking the bear,”...

Gia Macool posts Men love to get pissed at women for “poking the bear,”...

In this post, Gia Macool expresses frustration with a perceived double standard in how men and women manage conflict in relationships. She critiques men for blaming women for escalating tensions ('poking the bear') while simultaneously claiming to want a peaceful relationship. Gia argues that this expectation is unrealistic, as stress is an inherent aspect of relationships. Her narrative challenges the notion that one partner (in this case, women) should bear the burden of maintaining peace.

Thoughts

1

Men often blame women for stress in relationships.

Currently selected
2

The expectation for peace in relationships can be unrealistic.

3

Stress is a natural part of any relationship.

4

Both partners should share the responsibility for managing stress.

5

Women are inherently nurturing and responsible for maintaining harmony within the household.

6

Both partners are equally accountable for the emotional climate of their relationship.

7

A successful relationship is predicated on the submission of the woman to the man.

8

Men are primarily responsible for bringing peace to the relationship.

9

Women are primarily responsible for bringing peace to the relationship.

10

Each person is responsible for their own peace.

11

Both partners should actively contribute to conflict resolution.

12

Expecting one partner to ensure peace undermines the concept of equality.

13

Gendered expectations for peacekeeping create imbalances in relationships.

14

The burden of maintaining peace is unfairly placed on women in many contexts.

15

Men are primarily responsible for peace in a relationship

16

Peace is a realistic expectation in a relationship

17

Women are primarily responsible for peace in a relationship

18

Women sabotage peace in a relationship

19

Men sabotage peace in a relationship

20

Women undermine peace in relationships by escalating conflicts and failing to communicate effectively.

21

Men undermine peace in relationships by evading responsibility and often placing blame on women.

Beliefs

Showing belief distributions for Thought #1: "Men often blame women for stress in relationships."

Claude Opus 4.5

Age Groups

Under 20
58%
22%
20%
Believe: 58Disbelieve: 22Unsure: 20
20-39
52%
28%
20%
Believe: 52Disbelieve: 28Unsure: 20
40-59
45%
35%
20%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 20
60+
38%
40%
22%
Believe: 38Disbelieve: 40Unsure: 22

Gender

Male
35%
45%
20%
Believe: 35Disbelieve: 45Unsure: 20
Female
65%
15%
20%
Believe: 65Disbelieve: 15Unsure: 20

Religion

Christian
52%
28%
20%
Believe: 52Disbelieve: 28Unsure: 20
Muslim
45%
35%
20%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 20
Hindu
48%
30%
22%
Believe: 48Disbelieve: 30Unsure: 22
Buddhist
55%
22%
23%
Believe: 55Disbelieve: 22Unsure: 23
Agnostic
58%
24%
18%
Believe: 58Disbelieve: 24Unsure: 18
Atheist
56%
26%
18%
Believe: 56Disbelieve: 26Unsure: 18
Other
50%
28%
22%
Believe: 50Disbelieve: 28Unsure: 22

Education

High School
58%
22%
20%
Believe: 58Disbelieve: 22Unsure: 20
Associates
55%
24%
21%
Believe: 55Disbelieve: 24Unsure: 21
Technical Degree
52%
26%
22%
Believe: 52Disbelieve: 26Unsure: 22
Bachelor's
48%
30%
22%
Believe: 48Disbelieve: 30Unsure: 22
Master's
45%
32%
23%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 32Unsure: 23
PhD
42%
35%
23%
Believe: 42Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 23

Political Leaning

Far Left
72%
12%
16%
Believe: 72Disbelieve: 12Unsure: 16
Slightly Left
58%
18%
24%
Believe: 58Disbelieve: 18Unsure: 24
Central
45%
25%
30%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 30
Slightly Right
30%
42%
28%
Believe: 30Disbelieve: 42Unsure: 28
Far Right
18%
58%
24%
Believe: 18Disbelieve: 58Unsure: 24

Demographic Influence Ranking

Age
35
Sex
95
Religion
15
Education
40
Politics
70

Higher numbers indicate greater influence on belief formation (1-10 scale)

Deepseek 3.2

Age Groups

Under 20
70%
20%
10%
Believe: 70Disbelieve: 20Unsure: 10
20-39
65%
25%
10%
Believe: 65Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 10
40-59
50%
40%
10%
Believe: 50Disbelieve: 40Unsure: 10
60+
35%
55%
10%
Believe: 35Disbelieve: 55Unsure: 10

Gender

Male
40%
40%
20%
Believe: 40Disbelieve: 40Unsure: 20
Female
60%
25%
15%
Believe: 60Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 15

Religion

Christian
50%
30%
20%
Believe: 50Disbelieve: 30Unsure: 20
Muslim
50%
35%
15%
Believe: 50Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 15
Hindu
45%
35%
20%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 20
Buddhist
45%
35%
20%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 20
Agnostic
40%
40%
20%
Believe: 40Disbelieve: 40Unsure: 20
Atheist
55%
35%
10%
Believe: 55Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 10
Other
45%
35%
20%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 20

Education

High School
75%
20%
Believe: 75Disbelieve: 5Unsure: 20
Associates
70%
10%
20%
Believe: 70Disbelieve: 10Unsure: 20
Technical Degree
65%
15%
20%
Believe: 65Disbelieve: 15Unsure: 20
Bachelor's
60%
20%
20%
Believe: 60Disbelieve: 20Unsure: 20
Master's
50%
30%
20%
Believe: 50Disbelieve: 30Unsure: 20
PhD
40%
40%
20%
Believe: 40Disbelieve: 40Unsure: 20

Political Leaning

Far Left
85%
10%
Believe: 85Disbelieve: 5Unsure: 10
Slightly Left
75%
15%
10%
Believe: 75Disbelieve: 15Unsure: 10
Central
65%
25%
10%
Believe: 65Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 10
Slightly Right
40%
50%
10%
Believe: 40Disbelieve: 50Unsure: 10
Far Right
30%
60%
10%
Believe: 30Disbelieve: 60Unsure: 10

Demographic Influence Ranking

Age
20
Sex
60
Religion
10
Education
30
Politics
40

Higher numbers indicate greater influence on belief formation (1-10 scale)

Gemini 3 Pro

Age Groups

Under 20
60%
20%
20%
Believe: 60Disbelieve: 20Unsure: 20
20-39
55%
25%
20%
Believe: 55Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 20
40-59
45%
35%
20%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 20
60+
40%
40%
20%
Believe: 40Disbelieve: 40Unsure: 20

Gender

Male
35%
45%
20%
Believe: 35Disbelieve: 45Unsure: 20
Female
65%
15%
20%
Believe: 65Disbelieve: 15Unsure: 20

Religion

Christian
35%
40%
25%
Believe: 35Disbelieve: 40Unsure: 25
Muslim
25%
50%
25%
Believe: 25Disbelieve: 50Unsure: 25
Hindu
35%
35%
30%
Believe: 35Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 30
Buddhist
35%
30%
35%
Believe: 35Disbelieve: 30Unsure: 35
Agnostic
45%
25%
30%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 30
Atheist
50%
25%
25%
Believe: 50Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 25
Other
40%
25%
35%
Believe: 40Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 35

Education

High School
45%
35%
20%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 20
Associates
50%
30%
20%
Believe: 50Disbelieve: 30Unsure: 20
Technical Degree
35%
50%
15%
Believe: 35Disbelieve: 50Unsure: 15
Bachelor's
55%
30%
15%
Believe: 55Disbelieve: 30Unsure: 15
Master's
60%
25%
15%
Believe: 60Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 15
PhD
65%
20%
15%
Believe: 65Disbelieve: 20Unsure: 15

Political Leaning

Far Left
75%
10%
15%
Believe: 75Disbelieve: 10Unsure: 15
Slightly Left
60%
20%
20%
Believe: 60Disbelieve: 20Unsure: 20
Central
45%
25%
30%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 30
Slightly Right
30%
50%
20%
Believe: 30Disbelieve: 50Unsure: 20
Far Right
15%
75%
10%
Believe: 15Disbelieve: 75Unsure: 10

Demographic Influence Ranking

Age
45
Sex
95
Religion
60
Education
35
Politics
75

Higher numbers indicate greater influence on belief formation (1-10 scale)

GPT 5.1

Age Groups

Under 20
45%
25%
30%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 30
20-39
50%
25%
25%
Believe: 50Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 25
40-59
40%
35%
25%
Believe: 40Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 25
60+
30%
40%
30%
Believe: 30Disbelieve: 40Unsure: 30

Gender

Male
45%
35%
20%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 20
Female
70%
10%
20%
Believe: 70Disbelieve: 10Unsure: 20

Religion

Christian
45%
25%
30%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 30
Muslim
35%
35%
30%
Believe: 35Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 30
Hindu
40%
30%
30%
Believe: 40Disbelieve: 30Unsure: 30
Buddhist
45%
20%
35%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 20Unsure: 35
Agnostic
55%
20%
25%
Believe: 55Disbelieve: 20Unsure: 25
Atheist
60%
20%
20%
Believe: 60Disbelieve: 20Unsure: 20
Other
45%
25%
30%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 30

Education

High School
55%
25%
20%
Believe: 55Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 20
Associates
60%
20%
20%
Believe: 60Disbelieve: 20Unsure: 20
Technical Degree
45%
35%
20%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 20
Bachelor's
65%
15%
20%
Believe: 65Disbelieve: 15Unsure: 20
Master's
55%
15%
30%
Believe: 55Disbelieve: 15Unsure: 30
PhD
50%
15%
35%
Believe: 50Disbelieve: 15Unsure: 35

Political Leaning

Far Left
75%
10%
15%
Believe: 75Disbelieve: 10Unsure: 15
Slightly Left
60%
15%
25%
Believe: 60Disbelieve: 15Unsure: 25
Central
45%
20%
35%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 20Unsure: 35
Slightly Right
30%
40%
30%
Believe: 30Disbelieve: 40Unsure: 30
Far Right
15%
65%
20%
Believe: 15Disbelieve: 65Unsure: 20

Demographic Influence Ranking

Age
45
Sex
95
Religion
35
Education
50
Politics
60

Higher numbers indicate greater influence on belief formation (1-10 scale)

Grok 4

Age Groups

Under 20
40%
20%
40%
Believe: 40Disbelieve: 20Unsure: 40
20-39
55%
25%
20%
Believe: 55Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 20
40-59
45%
35%
20%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 20
60+
30%
50%
20%
Believe: 30Disbelieve: 50Unsure: 20

Gender

Male
30%
50%
20%
Believe: 30Disbelieve: 50Unsure: 20
Female
60%
20%
20%
Believe: 60Disbelieve: 20Unsure: 20

Religion

Christian
35%
40%
25%
Believe: 35Disbelieve: 40Unsure: 25
Muslim
30%
45%
25%
Believe: 30Disbelieve: 45Unsure: 25
Hindu
40%
30%
30%
Believe: 40Disbelieve: 30Unsure: 30
Buddhist
45%
25%
30%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 30
Agnostic
50%
20%
30%
Believe: 50Disbelieve: 20Unsure: 30
Atheist
55%
15%
30%
Believe: 55Disbelieve: 15Unsure: 30
Other
40%
30%
30%
Believe: 40Disbelieve: 30Unsure: 30

Education

High School
30%
50%
20%
Believe: 30Disbelieve: 50Unsure: 20
Associates
35%
45%
20%
Believe: 35Disbelieve: 45Unsure: 20
Technical Degree
40%
40%
20%
Believe: 40Disbelieve: 40Unsure: 20
Bachelor's
45%
35%
20%
Believe: 45Disbelieve: 35Unsure: 20
Master's
50%
30%
20%
Believe: 50Disbelieve: 30Unsure: 20
PhD
55%
25%
20%
Believe: 55Disbelieve: 25Unsure: 20

Political Leaning

Far Left
80%
10%
10%
Believe: 80Disbelieve: 10Unsure: 10
Slightly Left
65%
20%
15%
Believe: 65Disbelieve: 20Unsure: 15
Central
40%
40%
20%
Believe: 40Disbelieve: 40Unsure: 20
Slightly Right
25%
55%
20%
Believe: 25Disbelieve: 55Unsure: 20
Far Right
10%
80%
10%
Believe: 10Disbelieve: 80Unsure: 10

Demographic Influence Ranking

Age
40
Sex
90
Religion
30
Education
50
Politics
80

Higher numbers indicate greater influence on belief formation (1-10 scale)

B.E.T.s

Click on a B.E.T. to view detailed AI assessments for that bivariate typology.
1

B.E.T. #1

Currently selected

Thought 1:

Men are primarily responsible for peace in a relationship

Thought 2:

Peace is a realistic expectation in a relationship

5 AI models assessed this typology
2

B.E.T. #2

Thought 1:

Women are primarily responsible for peace in a relationship

Thought 2:

Peace is a realistic expectation in a relationship

5 AI models assessed this typology
3

B.E.T. #3

Thought 1:

Women sabotage peace in a relationship

Thought 2:

Men sabotage peace in a relationship

5 AI models assessed this typology
4

B.E.T. #4

Thought 1:

Responsibilities for maintaining peace should be gender specific

Thought 2:

Peace is attainable if both parties do their part

5 AI models assessed this typology

B.E.T. AI Assessments

Showing AI assessments for B.E.T. #1: "Men are primarily responsible for peace in a relationship" vs "Peace is a realistic expectation in a relationship"

Claude Opus 4.5

Believe → Believe

BB
Name:
Male Guardian Optimist
Population:
12%
Avg IQ:
98
Description:
Traditional individuals who believe men should take the lead in maintaining harmony and are confident that peaceful relationships are achievable. Often found in conservative or religious communities, they value clear gender roles and believe commitment and male leadership naturally produce stability.

Believe → Disbelieve

BD
Name:
Burdened Pessimist
Population:
4%
Avg IQ:
95
Description:
People who place responsibility on men for peace but doubt it can truly be achieved. Often cynical individuals who have witnessed failed relationships despite male efforts. May feel men are set up to fail in an impossible task, leading to resentment or fatalism about love.

Believe → Unsure

BU
Name:
Traditionalist Agnostic
Population:
6%
Avg IQ:
99
Description:
Those who accept male responsibility for relational peace but remain uncertain whether peace is realistic. Often older individuals reflecting on mixed experiences, or younger people raised traditionally but encountering modern relationship complexities.

Disbelieve → Believe

DB
Name:
Egalitarian Optimist
Population:
18%
Avg IQ:
108
Description:
Progressive individuals who reject gendered responsibility but believe peaceful relationships are absolutely possible through mutual effort. Often educated, feminist-leaning people who see partnership as shared work and have experienced or witnessed healthy equal relationships.

Disbelieve → Disbelieve

DD
Name:
Cynical Realist
Population:
8%
Avg IQ:
104
Description:
Disillusioned individuals who reject male responsibility and doubt peace is possible. Often divorced or relationship-avoidant people who view conflict as inherent to intimacy. May be intellectually detached, viewing romantic idealism as naive.

Disbelieve → Unsure

DU
Name:
Skeptical Questioner
Population:
10%
Avg IQ:
106
Description:
Those who reject male responsibility but remain uncertain about whether peace is achievable. Analytical types still forming their worldview, often younger adults navigating modern dating or academics studying relationship dynamics without firm conclusions.

Unsure → Believe

UB
Name:
Hopeful Undefined
Population:
15%
Avg IQ:
102
Description:
Optimistic individuals uncertain about who bears responsibility but confident peace is possible. Often emotionally intelligent people focused on outcomes over structure, believing love works out regardless of who leads. Common among spiritual but non-dogmatic types.

Unsure → Disbelieve

UD
Name:
Confused Pessimist
Population:
7%
Avg IQ:
94
Description:
Those unsure who should maintain peace and doubtful it exists anyway. Often people with chaotic relationship histories who have given up trying to understand dynamics. May struggle with attachment or have avoidant tendencies.

Unsure → Unsure

UU
Name:
Open Uncertain
Population:
20%
Avg IQ:
100
Description:
Genuinely undecided on both questions. Often young adults without significant relationship experience, or contemplative individuals who resist categorical thinking. May be philosophers at heart or simply disengaged from relationship discourse.

Deepseek 3.2

Believe → Believe

BB
Name:
Idealistic Traditionalist
Population:
15%
Avg IQ:
105
Description:
Holds traditional views on gender roles and believes relationships should inherently strive for and achieve peace, often optimistic about relationship dynamics.

Believe → Disbelieve

BD
Name:
Contradictory Optimist
Population:
10%
Avg IQ:
100
Description:
Asserts that men have the main responsibility for maintaining peace, yet doubts that lasting peace is achievable, possibly due to personal experience or cynicism about human nature.

Believe → Unsure

BU
Name:
Hesitant Traditionalist
Population:
12%
Avg IQ:
102
Description:
Firmly believes men are the primary peacekeepers but is uncertain whether peace is a realistic expectation, reflecting internal conflict between ideals and reality.

Disbelieve → Believe

DB
Name:
Egalitarian Realist
Population:
20%
Avg IQ:
110
Description:
Rejects the idea that men are solely responsible for peace, viewing it as a shared duty, but still believes peace is a realistic and attainable goal in relationships.

Disbelieve → Disbelieve

DD
Name:
Skeptical Nonconformist
Population:
18%
Avg IQ:
108
Description:
Disbelieves both traditional gender roles and the notion that peace is a realistic expectation, often seeing relationships as inherently conflictual and requiring constant negotiation.

Disbelieve → Unsure

DU
Name:
Ambivalent Rejector
Population:
15%
Avg IQ:
105
Description:
Rejects the idea of male responsibility for peace but is unsure if peace is realistic, possibly due to a nuanced or undecided view on relationship dynamics.

Unsure → Believe

UB
Name:
Tentative Optimist
Population:
5%
Avg IQ:
100
Description:
Uncertain about gender roles in peacekeeping but believes peace is a realistic expectation, suggesting a hopeful yet open-minded approach to relationships.

Unsure → Disbelieve

UD
Name:
Pessimistic Agnostic
Population:
3%
Avg IQ:
98
Description:
Unsure if men are primarily responsible for peace but disbelieves that peace is realistic, indicating a general pessimism about relationship harmony.

Unsure → Unsure

UU
Name:
Complete Agnostic
Population:
2%
Avg IQ:
95
Description:
Uncertain about both claims, likely due to lack of experience, deep ambivalence, or a belief that relationships are too complex to make such generalizations.

Gemini 3 Pro

Believe → Believe

BB
Name:
The Patriarchal Stoic
Population:
12%
Avg IQ:
102
Description:
This individual subscribes to the 'Captain of the Ship' ideology. They believe that if a man effectively leads and absorbs emotional volatility, the relationship will be peaceful. They view turmoil as a failure of male leadership or containment. They are often traditionalists who see peace as the natural reward for proper hierarchy.

Believe → Disbelieve

BD
Name:
The Weary Atlas
Population:
8%
Avg IQ:
105
Description:
This type believes it is a man's duty to maintain order, yet holds a cynical view that relationships are inherently chaotic or 'impossible to win.' They often view themselves as Sisyphus, constantly managing female emotionality or relational structural issues without hope of lasting tranquility. Common among burnt-out traditionalists.

Believe → Unsure

BU
Name:
The Anxious Provider
Population:
6%
Avg IQ:
99
Description:
They place the burden of emotional regulation squarely on men but are unsure if the task is achievable. They live in a state of performance anxiety, believing that any conflict is their fault to fix, but fearing that the dynamic of the relationship is too unpredictable to ever truly settle.

Disbelieve → Believe

DB
Name:
The Egalitarian Romantic
Population:
25%
Avg IQ:
108
Description:
They fiercely reject the idea that men alone hold the keys to peace, viewing emotional labor as shared (or primarily female-driven). Simultaneously, they are highly optimistic, believing that through communication and equality, a state of lasting harmony is not only possible but the standard.

Disbelieve → Disbelieve

DD
Name:
The Combative Realist
Population:
10%
Avg IQ:
104
Description:
This profilist rejects gendered responsibility—perhaps believing women cause conflict or that no one is to blame—and insists that conflict is the default state of intimacy. They view 'peace' as a boring or deceptive illusion. To them, relationships are about friction, growth, and struggle, not tranquility.

Disbelieve → Unsure

DU
Name:
The Modern Pragmatist
Population:
14%
Avg IQ:
106
Description:
They reject the placing of emotional burden on men, favoring a shared approach, but remain agnostic about the outcome. They view relationships as complex systems where peace is a variable, not a constant. They differ from the realist in that they haven't given up hope, but they don't count on it.

Unsure → Believe

UB
Name:
The Passive Idealist
Population:
11%
Avg IQ:
96
Description:
This group assumes peace is the natural state of love ('Love finds a way') but has no clear theory on how it is achieved or who is responsible. They often drift into relationships expecting things to 'just work out' and are baffled when specific gender dynamics or responsibilities are required to maintain the peace they expect.

Unsure → Disbelieve

UD
Name:
The Disillusioned Drifter
Population:
7%
Avg IQ:
98
Description:
They are unsure who is supposed to fix things—men, women, or both—but they are certain that it doesn't matter because peace is a lie. Likely traumatized by past relationships, they lack a structural theory (gender roles) to explain their pain, resulting in a generalized relational nihilism.

Unsure → Unsure

UU
Name:
The Relational Novice
Population:
7%
Avg IQ:
100
Description:
This category consists largely of the inexperienced or the deeply ambivalent. They have formed no strong opinions on gender roles within relationships and have not yet determined if long-term harmony is a realistic goal. They are in 'observation mode' or simply indifferent to relationship theory.

GPT 5.1

Believe → Believe

BB
Name:
Male-Led Harmony Idealists
Population:
18%
Avg IQ:
100
Description:
They see men as the primary emotional leaders and stabilizers in relationships and believe that when men step up—by managing their tempers, providing security, and taking initiative—sustained peace is very achievable. Often influenced by traditional, religious, or certain self-help narratives, they emphasize male responsibility as noble rather than oppressive and imagine a relatively calm, low-conflict partnership as a realistic goal.

Believe → Disbelieve

BD
Name:
Burdened Male Pessimists
Population:
3%
Avg IQ:
99
Description:
They accept the idea that men are mainly responsible for keeping the peace but doubt that real, lasting peace is attainable. They may feel that expectations placed on men are heavy or unfair, or that modern dating, economic stress, or trauma make harmony unrealistic. This group can include disillusioned traditionalists and people who feel relationships are stacked against men doing enough to keep things calm.

Believe → Unsure

BU
Name:
Conditional Male-Peace Advocates
Population:
4%
Avg IQ:
100
Description:
They tentatively agree that men should shoulder most responsibility for relational peace, but they are unsure whether deep, lasting peace is realistic in practice. They see peace as possible under specific conditions—mature partners, good communication, compatible values—but are cautious. They may consume relationship content that stresses male leadership while also acknowledging today’s relational instability.

Disbelieve → Believe

DB
Name:
Mutual-Responsibility Optimists
Population:
38%
Avg IQ:
102
Description:
They reject the idea that men alone should carry the burden and instead see peace as a joint project, with both partners equally accountable. They still believe a largely peaceful relationship is a realistic, attainable norm if both people communicate, self-regulate, and negotiate fairly. This is a common stance among people who’ve been exposed to modern couples-therapy ideas, egalitarian gender norms, or evidence-based relationship advice.

Disbelieve → Disbelieve

DD
Name:
Conflict-Aware Egalitarians
Population:
7%
Avg IQ:
101
Description:
They deny that men are primarily responsible and also doubt that long-term peace is realistic. To them, both partners co-create the climate, and conflict is an unavoidable, recurring feature of intimate life. They don’t necessarily see this as failure—just human nature. They may emphasize learning to argue well instead of chasing a perpetually peaceful relationship that they consider idealized or naïve.

Disbelieve → Unsure

DU
Name:
Skeptical Collaborators
Population:
10%
Avg IQ:
101
Description:
They see relationship peace as a shared responsibility, but they’re uncertain whether stable peace is actually achievable over time. They tend to view relationships as ongoing negotiations with cyclical periods of harmony and tension. They might believe that effort matters but that factors like mental health, finances, and family background often make calm, low-conflict relationships difficult to maintain.

Unsure → Believe

UB
Name:
Harmony-First Pragmatists
Population:
14%
Avg IQ:
100
Description:
They aren’t sure whether men should be chiefly responsible or whether roles should be defined that way at all, but they do believe that a largely peaceful relationship is possible. They focus more on practical behavior—good listening, fairness, and emotional maturity—than on which gender “should” do what. Their stance is often, “Whoever can bring peace should do it,” and they’re optimistic that with effort, relative calm is achievable.

Unsure → Disbelieve

UD
Name:
Wary Romantics
Population:
5%
Avg IQ:
99
Description:
They’re undecided about whether men should carry most responsibility for peace and simultaneously doubt that true, sustained peace is realistic. Often informed by personal or secondhand experiences of messy breakups, family conflict, or volatility, they may still want love but expect turbulence as normal. They’re skeptical of tidy narratives about either traditional roles or perfect harmony.

Unsure → Unsure

UU
Name:
Relationship Agnostics
Population:
1%
Avg IQ:
100
Description:
They are unsure both about who should be primarily responsible for peace and about whether peace itself is a realistic expectation. This can include people with limited relationship experience, those who avoid committing to strong views on gender roles, or highly individualistic thinkers who believe every couple is so different that generalizations about responsibility or peace are nearly meaningless.

Grok 4

Believe → Believe

BB
Name:
Traditional Optimist
Population:
15%
Avg IQ:
95
Description:
Holds patriarchal views, optimistic about harmonious relationships, often found in conservative communities valuing male leadership.

Believe → Disbelieve

BD
Name:
Pessimistic Patriarch
Population:
10%
Avg IQ:
90
Description:
Believes men should maintain peace but sees relationships as inherently conflict-ridden, perhaps from personal disappointments.

Believe → Unsure

BU
Name:
Hesitant Traditionalist
Population:
8%
Avg IQ:
100
Description:
Supports male responsibility for peace but wavers on its achievability, reflecting internal conflict or limited experience.

Disbelieve → Believe

DB
Name:
Egalitarian Optimist
Population:
20%
Avg IQ:
110
Description:
Rejects gender-specific roles, confidently expects peaceful partnerships through mutual effort and communication.

Disbelieve → Disbelieve

DD
Name:
Realistic Skeptic
Population:
15%
Avg IQ:
105
Description:
Dismisses male primacy in peace-keeping and views constant harmony as unrealistic, embracing conflict as part of life.

Disbelieve → Unsure

DU
Name:
Open-minded Doubter
Population:
10%
Avg IQ:
102
Description:
Opposes sole male responsibility but remains uncertain about overall peace in relationships, open to evidence.

Unsure → Believe

UB
Name:
Hopeful Agnostic
Population:
7%
Avg IQ:
98
Description:
Unsure about men's role but believes peace is attainable, often exploring various relationship dynamics.

Unsure → Disbelieve

UD
Name:
Cynical Indecisive
Population:
5%
Avg IQ:
92
Description:
Wavers on responsibility but firmly doubts lasting peace, influenced by media portrayals of dramatic relationships.

Unsure → Unsure

UU
Name:
Total Undecided
Population:
10%
Avg IQ:
100
Description:
Completely uncertain on both claims, possibly apathetic or deeply reflective, avoiding firm opinions on relationships.

Belief Systems

Click on a belief system to view detailed AI assessments for that persona.
1

Belief System #1

Currently selected

Belief Structure:

Both partners should equally share the responsibility for maintaining peace in a relationship.
Believe
Conflict is a normal aspect of relationships that both partners must navigate together.
Believe
Expecting one partner to be solely responsible for emotional labor is unrealistic and detrimental to relationship health.
Believe
5 AI models assessed this belief system
2

Belief System #2

Belief Structure:

Responsibilities for maintaining peace should be gender-specific, primarily resting on men.
Believe
Men are naturally suited for roles of strength and stability, which includes managing conflict and ensuring peace.
Believe
Women possess emotional intelligence which should be directed towards managing interpersonal connections rather than peacekeeping.
Believe
5 AI models assessed this belief system
3

Belief System #3

Belief Structure:

Women undermine peace in relationships by escalating conflicts and failing to communicate effectively.
Believe
Women often prioritize emotional expression over conflict resolution, which can lead to intensified disputes.
Believe
Expectations for men to maintain harmony with an antagonistic woman is unrealistic.
Believe
By engaging in passive-aggressive behaviors instead of direct communication, women can contribute to ongoing tensions in the relationship.
Believe
5 AI models assessed this belief system
4

Belief System #4

Belief Structure:

Men undermine peace in relationships by evading responsibility and often placing blame on women.
Believe
Men frequently avoid addressing their own contributions to conflict, expecting women to bear the emotional labor.
Believe
When men assert their desire for peace while simultaneously engaging in conflict escalation, it creates unhealthy dynamics.
Believe
The reluctance of men to communicate effectively exacerbates tensions in relationships, leading to unresolved issues.
Believe
5 AI models assessed this belief system

Belief System AI Assessments

Showing AI assessments for Belief System #1

Claude Opus 4.5

Persona Name

Harmony Harper

Estimated IQ

108
Average intelligence estimate

Assessment Status

✓ Complete
AI model has evaluated this belief system

Persona Profile

Harmony is a 34-year-old couples therapist from Portland who runs a popular Instagram account called 'Balanced Love Chronicles.' She owns an impressive collection of self-help books and has attended no fewer than twelve relationship workshops in the past three years. She frequently reminds her friends that she and her partner Derek have 'done the work' and proudly displays a framed copy of their jointly-signed 'Emotional Labor Distribution Agreement' in their kitchen. Harmony believes deeply in spreadsheets for tracking household chores and has strong opinions about the proper way to have a 'feelings check-in.' While her views on relationship equity are genuinely sound and well-reasoned, she does have an unfortunate habit of analyzing her friends' relationships uninvited over brunch.

Deepseek 3.2

Persona Name

Dr. Anya Sharma

Estimated IQ

120
Average intelligence estimate

Assessment Status

✓ Complete
AI model has evaluated this belief system

Persona Profile

Dr. Anya Sharma is a 42-year-old relationship therapist and author with a PhD in social psychology. She runs a popular podcast called 'Balanced Bonds' where she breaks down complex interpersonal dynamics with wit and clarity. Anya believes that relationships thrive on shared emotional labor and mutual accountability. She's known for her no-nonsense advice, often using humor to defuse tension while emphasizing that conflict isn't a sign of failure but an opportunity for growth. In her free time, she practices mindfulness meditation and enjoys hiking with her partner, where they 'equally share the responsibility of not getting lost.'

Gemini 3 Pro

Persona Name

Julian Vance

Estimated IQ

122
Average intelligence estimate

Assessment Status

✓ Complete
AI model has evaluated this belief system

Persona Profile

Julian is a 38-year-old conflict mediator who approaches interpersonal dynamics with a refreshing, if occasionally didactic, pragmatism. Having thoroughly digested the works of the Gottman Institute and modern attachment theory, he views relationships as collaborative ecosystems rather than battlegrounds for dominance. He rejects the romanticized notion of the 'stoic protector' or the 'long-suffering nurturer,' arguing instead for a logistical and emotional parity that he calls 'relational equity.' While his friends value his stable and grounded advice, his tendency to analyze casual arguments through the lens of 'emotional labor distribution' can make him seem slightly detached during heated moments.

GPT 5.1

Persona Name

Elena Hartman

Estimated IQ

122
Average intelligence estimate

Assessment Status

✓ Complete
AI model has evaluated this belief system

Persona Profile

Elena Hartman is a reflective, emotionally literate pragmatist who approaches relationships like cooperative projects rather than romantic battlegrounds. She tends to see conflict not as evidence that something is broken, but as a predictable part of two distinct people trying to share a life. From her perspective, the health of a relationship is measured less by the absence of disagreement and more by whether both partners show up to manage those tensions together. She is acutely aware of the invisible work that keeps relationships stable—so-called emotional labor—and finds it unfair and unhealthy when this is silently outsourced to one partner, usually along gendered lines. Elena is likely the sort of person who notices who initiates the hard conversations, who tracks anniversaries and social plans, and who does the soothing after arguments; she strongly believes those tasks should be more evenly distributed. Her thinking style is balanced between analytic and empathetic. She reasons from general principles (fairness, reciprocity, shared responsibility) and then checks them against lived realities. In discussions, she’s inclined to challenge narratives that glorify self-sacrifice or cast one partner as the permanent emotional caretaker. She may be drawn to fields like counseling, mediation, social psychology, or organizational culture, where systems of shared responsibility matter. Elena likely values communication skills, mutual accountability, and explicit agreements in her personal life. She dislikes blame games and martyrdom dynamics, preferring clear expectations and collaborative problem-solving. Others often experience her as fair-minded, calm during conflict, and insistent that everyone involved—including herself—owns their part in maintaining peace and emotional safety.

Grok 4

Persona Name

Harmony Hughes

Estimated IQ

125
Average intelligence estimate

Assessment Status

✓ Complete
AI model has evaluated this belief system

Persona Profile

Harmony Hughes is a quirky relationship podcaster from Seattle, known for her hit show 'Equitable Embrace,' where she dispenses advice on modern love with a side of herbal tea recommendations. A former yoga instructor turned self-proclaimed 'love guru,' Harmony believes in cosmic balance and equal vibes in partnerships. She's often seen at farmers' markets debating the merits of shared chore charts, sporting tie-dye shirts and a perpetual zen smile. Her belief in mutual responsibility stems from her own rollercoaster romances, including a brief stint married to a professional juggler. Harmony's mantra: 'Peace isn't a solo act—it's a duet!'