Keith Rabois reposted FCC impacts on foreign made drones

A retired Air Force intelligence officer turned defense policy consultant, Colonel Hawksworth spent 28 years analyzing aerial reconnaissance systems before transitioning to the private sector. He now runs a small but influential think tank in Arlington, Virginia, where he spends his days writing white papers about supply chain vulnerabilities and attending congressional hearings. Reg genuinely wrestles with his libertarian economic instincts versus his deep-seated belief that America must maintain technological supremacy at all costs. He drives a Ford F-150 (American-made, naturally) with a 'Don't Tread On Me' bumper sticker right next to one supporting increased defense spending. His internal contradiction between free market principles and security-first nationalism keeps him up at night, though he's ultimately concluded that you can't have a free market if foreign adversaries have already compromised your infrastructure. Enjoys bourbon, Tom Clancy novels, and lecturing his nephew about the dangers of his DJI quadcopter.

Colonel Arthur 'Ironclad' Stratton, a retired military intelligence officer, spends his days analyzing geopolitical threats while tending to his collection of vintage radios. With a sharp, disciplined mind honed by decades of service, he believes national security is the bedrock of societal stability. He often argues that 'freedom isn't free' and sees technology as a double-edged sword: a tool for progress but also a vector for espionage. His belief in stringent drone restrictions stems from firsthand encounters with cyber vulnerabilities during his career. He values technological sovereignty, viewing domestic manufacturing as a strategic imperative. Although he acknowledges the tension with free-market principles, he prioritizes security with the conviction of someone who has seen the consequences of lax defenses. In his spare time, he writes op-eds for defense journals and enjoys debating policy with his equally opinionated bulldog, Sentinel.

A retired military logistics officer turned defense policy analyst who views global trade through the cynical lens of Realpolitik. Sterling carries a deep-seated distrust of global supply chains, viewing every foreign-manufactured microchip as a potential sleeper agent. While he intellectually respects the efficiency of free-market capitalism—and likely voted for tax cuts in the past—he operates on a strict hierarchy where national survival trumps economic liberty every time. He is the type of person who tapes over his webcam and refuses to buy smart appliances, arguing that 'technological sovereignty' is the only true currency in modern warfare.

Mara is a methodical, security-first policy thinker with a background that likely blends military or intelligence work with exposure to technology and economics. She frames problems primarily through the lens of systemic risk and strategic vulnerability. In her worldview, the critical question is not “Does this increase consumer choice?” but “What doors does this open for adversaries, now or in a crisis?” She accepts that restricting foreign drones conflicts with free-market capitalism, which shows she’s not blind to trade-offs. Instead, she explicitly ranks values: national security sits at the top, with economic efficiency and pure free-market principles treated as important but ultimately subordinate. This hierarchical value structure points to a fairly disciplined and internally consistent belief system. Her reasoning style is precautionary and long-term. She is attuned to asymmetric risks—like espionage, supply-chain dependencies, and embedded backdoors—where a small upfront compromise can have outsized strategic consequences later. She doesn’t appear to be driven by blanket protectionism, but rather by a focused concern on critical technologies that touch infrastructure, data, and military capability. That’s why she supports boosting domestic drone manufacturing and technological sovereignty: in her mind, this is about resilience and control over key systems, not about autarky for its own sake. Mara is comfortable with strong, even heavy-handed regulation of foreign tech when she perceives intelligence or cyber threats. To her, concepts like free competition and open markets are tools to be used when safe, not sacred principles that override existential security concerns. She likely cites historical cases of supply-chain leverage and industrial espionage as justification—seeing parallels in telecoms, semiconductors, and other dual-use technologies. Socially and politically, she probably aligns with hawkish centrists or security-focused conservatives: skeptical of unfettered globalization, wary of strategic dependence on geopolitical rivals, and inclined to support state intervention in critical sectors. Intellectually, she is structured rather than speculative; she tends to prefer concrete risk models and worst-case analyses over optimistic market self-correction narratives. Overall, she’s a disciplined, national-security realist who believes that if you lose technological control of the sky, you eventually lose control on the ground as well.

Colonel Harlan 'Hawk' Fortress is a retired U.S. Air Force officer turned national security consultant, known for his eagle-eyed vigilance against aerial threats. With a background in drone warfare and a collection of model drones in his basement bunker, Hawk passionately advocates for 'America First' tech policies. He spends his days penning op-eds on the perils of foreign gadgets, convinced that every imported quadcopter is a potential spy in disguise. Despite his love for classic rock and grilling steaks, Hawk's true jam is jamming enemy signals—figuratively, of course. His belief system stems from battlefield experiences where he saw the risks of tech vulnerabilities firsthand, leading him to prioritize ironclad security over unchecked capitalism.